Our next print edition will be March 5
Our next eNews will be February 27

Candle Lighting Time for Albany, NY:
Friday, February 28, 2020 5:25 pm

Ad reservations are accepted until Thursday, 5 p.m., 7 days prior to publication date.

Local news will be accepted for consideration  until Tuesday at 5 p.m., 10 days prior to publication.

Adviser to top EU court: Goods from Judea  and Samaria, Golan Heights should be labeled

European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg, Nov. 18, 2006.Photo courtesy of Cédric Puisney/Wikimedia Commons.

(Israel Hayom via JNS) – Judea and Samaria goods that are imported into the European Union must be clearly labeled as such to avoid misleading consumers, a senior legal adviser to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently said. The ECJ is considering a request from France’s top tribunal “for clarification of rules on labeling goods” from Judea and Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.

According to French news agency AFP, while the ECJ is not obliged to follow Advocate General Gerard Hogan’s advice, the former Irish judge’s legal opinions are considered highly influential in the bench’s deliberations.

Ethical Considerations?
In his brief, Hogan said that under E.U. laws, labels must make it clear if products originate from occupied territories, and particularly if they come from Israeli settlements beyond the Green Line.

“E.U. law requires, for a product originating in a territory occupied by Israel since 1967, the indication of the geographical name of this territory and, where it is the case, the indication that the product comes from an Israeli settlement,” said an ECJ statement outlining Hogan’s legal opinion. He said that the E.U. rules on labeling products take into account “ethical considerations” that might influence a consumer’s purchases.

According to the report, citing previous E.U. court rulings saying that Israel’s settlement policy is illegal, Hogan said: “It is hardly surprising that some consumers may regard this manifest breach of international law as an ethical consideration that influences their consumer preferences and in respect of which they may require further information.”

“The absence of the indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of a product originating in a territory occupied by Israel and, in any event, a settlement colony, might mislead the consumer as to the true country of origin or place of provenance of the food,” he said.

Double Standard Evident
The Lawfare Project, a legal think tank and litigation fund that fights anti-Semitism and the BDS movement, said that if the ECJ adopts Hogan’s recommendation, “it would open a Pandora’s box of lawsuits” against European companies that fail to “properly label products from relevant countries of origin” unless the requirements were applied only to Israel, in which case it would be a ‘flagrant act of discrimination.’ ”

Lawfare Project Director Brooke Goldstein told the Israeli daily Israel Hayom that “the European court has a historic opportunity to put an end to this double standard, which is […] biased against Israel.”

“This type of label is a blatant act of discrimination,” she said. “There are hundreds of disputed territories around the world, but only Israeli businesses and European companies that work with them will find themselves targeted by these unnecessary political requirements.”

This article first appeared in Israel Hayom.



Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.