The Columbia University Library. Photo courtesy of Pixabay.
JNS
According to the New York Post, American Jews are beginning to respond to systemic anti-Semitism in higher education by “voting with their feet.” The Post notes that, for the first time, no graduate of the Jewish high school Ramaz on Manhattan’s Upper East Side will be attending Columbia University’s liberal arts college this year
Jews Opt Out
The reason is, unquestionably, anti-Semitism. Ramaz told the Post that it has warned students about the extent of anti-Semitism on various campuses and Rory Lancman—an activist, academic, former politician and Columbia graduate—is quoted saying: “Jewish families are voting with their feet and choosing colleges and universities that take anti-Semitism seriously. I would not recommend my daughters to apply to Columbia or other colleges that aren’t committed to protect them as Jews.”
College Activities
On a certain level, this informal boycott is entirely understandable. Indeed, Columbia may be the most institutionally anti-Semitic major institution in the United States. It goes so far as to host a “Center for Palestine Studies” that is, essentially, a shrine to Edward Said, an alleged scholar who dedicated his entire intellectual life to demonizing Israel and its supporters.
By the end of his life, Said was openly calling for Israel’s dissolution as a Jewish state and, in a stunning (and stunningly racist) act of cultural appropriation, declared that he was “the last Jewish intellectual.”
Obviously, such behavior would never have been tolerated had it been directed at any other minority, but Columbia has long since made clear that its concerns on this score are decidedly conditional. How else, one wonders, could Columbia have transformed a figure as ugly as Said into the object of something very like an idolatrous cult?
No Surprise
It should have been no surprise, then, that when mobs of genocidal racists took over the Columbia campus earlier this year and harassed, intimidated and assaulted Jews, the university leadership refused to take early and decisive action. Instead, it threw its Jewish students to the wolves. The mobs were only ejected at the end of the semester after they smashed a campus building to pieces.
Recently, Columbia president Minouche Shafik resigned, but there is little doubt that, as soon as the new school year begins, anti-Semitism purveyor’s conquest and colonization of the university will resume. There is, after all, no one willing to stop it.
Given this, it is not surprising that Jewish students have decided not to waste their talents and money on Columbia University. Indeed, it would have been surprising if they even considered doing so.
After all, no student should willingly allow constant abuse at a school they are paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to attend. In fact, no one is obliged to stay in any educational, social, political or cultural institution that treats them like refuse. No non-Jew would stand for it, and no Jew should either.
Jewish Exploitation
There is also a certain sense of vengeance involved. For decades, America’s universities—and many other institutions—have been happy to exploit American Jews’ talents, skills, assets and votes. Then, when the moment came for reciprocity, these institutions chose betrayal instead. There is all the reason in the world for the Jews to say: Fine, let’s see how they do without us.
Should Jews Do This?
Nonetheless, as pleasurable as it can be at times, it is worth asking whether “voting with their feet” is the correct route for American Jews to take.
It may not be, because it is the avowed purpose of today’s anti-Semites, led by the Red-Green Alliance of progressive leftists and Muslim supremacists, to ghettoize American Jews. That is, they seek to strip American Jews of whatever power, influence and prosperity they have achieved over the last several centuries and relegate them to the margins of American life, where they can be easily preyed upon whenever the mood strikes.
Ghettoizing Themselves?
It is horrible for Jews to stay in an anti-Semitic environment but, by departing, they unwittingly risk ghettoizing themselves. That is, they may end up consenting to what is, in effect, the kind of de facto apartheid that existed in the former Soviet Union and other Communist countries, under which Jews were effectively barred from many educational institutions, government jobs and other aspects of society.
If this ghettoization is accomplished, American Jews will be effectively barred from certain universities, neighborhoods, cities, political and activist groups, and cultural activities. This is what segregation looks like and Jews should not submit to it.
If American Jews wish to avoid doing so, voting with their feet will at times be necessary. But other measures can be taken as well. For example, if Jewish students at Columbia were properly organized, they could engage with the campus Nazis on their own terms and disperse them. They could sue the university not just for redress but for its entire endowment, threatening the institution’s very existence. They could go about the campus in groups and publicly confront those attempting to harass and assault them. They could make it clear that if the Jews have no peace on campus, no one will have peace on campus.
None of this involves breaking the law, but it does require a decision of the will. In many ways, it would be superior to the decision to simply leave. But it cannot be made without a new radicalization, a more aggressive stance that is willing to make what the late civil-rights leader and congressman John Lewis called “good trouble”—trouble that upends an unjust order. As Lewis put it: “Get in good trouble, necessary trouble, and redeem the soul of America.”
Jews at Columbia and other institutions have suffered a tremendous injustice, but there is no need for them to flee. For a year now, anti-Semites have been permitted to make bad trouble on campus and indeed everywhere. It’s time for Jews to make some good trouble before the walls of the ghetto close in.
